So I've been researching diligently on my thesis recently, and a certain scholar I keep running into likes to use the term Aristotelian a lot. Now, I know who is Aristotle is, but I didn't know what he meant by it. I looked into it and learned about Aristotelian categories.
Picture from WikiMedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aristotle_Altemps_Inv8575.jpg_) |
Aristotelian Categories: simplistically defined, the idea that all things can be divided into set categories
I'll be the first to admit I do not have a firm grasp of this concept, but the scholar used it to explain that he believes we cannot simply assume a word fits absolutely as either a noun or a verb, that maybe there was gradient space where words exist between two word categories. I've been thinking a little bit about categories in a more broad sense lately. Like there are some commandments and morals which are easy to categorize. Killing is bad. Lying is a sin. Stealing is against the law. It is obvious to me that there is an absolute right and wrong here, barring the case of Jean Valjean, but let's just keep this simple.
But there's a lot of other things that I can't put in those tidy categories. Like, if I'm seeking to interact perfectly as Christ did with others, what is the perfect way of speaking, communicating, and interacting? What are the right questions to ask when getting to know someone? How do you put people at ease? These questions are really leading to one big one: Is there a right and wrong way to speak as Christ spoke?
From what I gather, Aristotelian categories don't work very well here. With billions of people living and multiple billions already dead or yet to be living, there is an infinite number of human beings with diverse and idiosyncratic perceptions and means of communicating. I believe it is far too simplistic that there is one perfect way to communicate and put all these people at ease. While this is relieving to me in some ways, it also leaves me wanting answers. Where do you aim to better your communication skills?
And that's just a sliver of all the areas that we can improve in that don't fit in Aristotelian categories. What's the perfect way to serve someone? How do you comfort someone perfectly? How do you balance the many demands of life perfectly? Etc.
There's so much grey, and sometimes that grey is unsettling to me. It is paralyzing in a way. I wish that there was black and white, and the model for how to behave was clear, but it isn't. I guess I have more questions than answers today. What do you think? How do you find a model for action?
Cheers,
Amanda Kae
I want your input too. How do you not be overwhelmed by all the possible correct paths? Where do you find answers for the grey areas of life?
I kind of find the grey areas fun. You kind of learn to sail on them. If you mess up here, try a different tack.
ReplyDeleteI am completely socially inept by the way, haha. Just am determined to keep trying until I get better. There's rarely a situation that you can't recover from. If you're a doofus today and a smoothie tomorrow people will generally remember you somewhere in the middle and it all works out. Kinda like most of the grey areas in life, haha.
You are not socially inept!! You have a MILLION friends. You see someone you know everywhere you go. And the biggest compliment to your awesomeness is that those people will actually COME UP TO YOU and TALK TO YOU.
DeleteThis post reminded me of an article about why Russians don't smile--http://blog.properrussian.com/2011/05/why-russians-are-not-smiling.html
ReplyDeleteCulture also makes grey-zones out of normally black and white behavior.
My problem is how do you accept the greyscale without also accepting moral relativism? I mean. I believe in moral relativity in that a soldier isn't a murderer. But I don't believe that a bad situation justifies bad choices. It just makes those choices understandable.
Does that make sense?