Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Pilgrimages


Hey Steph,
  I watched this movie last week called The Way. I highly recommend it. You can find it on Netflix. The film is about a father journeying on El Camino de Santiago, or the Way of St. James, with the ashes of his son. The journey is a pilgrimage to Galicia and the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela. Santiago is the Spanish name of James, the New Testament writer, and the cathedral is the supposed resting place of James’s body. The film was a beautiful telling of a modern man performing a timeless act of endurance and vulnerability. I’ve been thinking a lot about pilgrimages recently.

Pilgrim: a person who journeys to a place of spiritual significance for the restoration of their soul, for strengthening of their faith, for the blessing of a miracle, or for the deepening of their understanding

The idea of pilgrimage is a beautiful one for me. I love the idea of setting apart an act to focus on God. I love the symbolism of the Jewish tallit, or prayer shawl, and its tzitzit, or fringes, which remind wearers of the 613 commandments of the Torah. And Hindu and Buddhist Japa mala, beads used to recall the number of times a mantra is repeated while meditating. And the Catholic thurible, a censer used to expel smoke toward heaven in representation of prayer. And the Islamic Qur’an board used to help believers memorize section after section of the Qur’an. The ink is scraped off again and again to be replaced by another section of text. Tradition is that the boards grow more sacred with each addition of text, just as the memorizer grows more sacred with the words of the Qur’an held in their minds.
From top left to bottom right: Jewish Tallit with Tzitzit; Hindu and Buddhist Japa  Mala, Catholic Thurible, and Islamic Qur'an Board. 

The beautiful thing about pilgrimages is that nearly all religions practice pilgrimage of some sort.  In a world full of stuff around us, it’s easy for objects to lose their meaning, and I think that is the benefit of a pilgrimage. While we focus on our journey, we take stride after stride in an effort to be nearer to God. Our actions, not just an object, are set aside for us to grow more godly, more pure, more at one with deity. The practice seems to be somewhat archaic from our American perspective. When we think pilgrims we think of Mayflower passengers coming to New England or, for the more literary among us, of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and his odd group of pilgrims. But every year some 100 million people take a pilgrimage. You can find some great lists of pilgrimages here, here, and here. And if you’re in the mood to listen to a song about a pilgrimage, check this video out.
Though the practice of pilgrimage may seem more of an Eastern tradition, I see it in my own beliefs as a Latter-day Saint. As part of LDS beliefs, believers make a pilgrimage of sorts to a temple where they make commitments to God and learn more about their spiritual selves. The journey to the temple is one in which believers set apart a physical space to commune with God. Latter-day Saints who go to the temple come after they’ve reached maturity and have journeyed far enough down a spiritual and religious path to reach the destination of the temple. For these reasons, I see the temple as a type of pilgrimage.
It makes me happy that not all the richness of these religious pilgrimages are gone from American life; that I, too, can set apart my strides to walk toward a place of pilgrimage and seek God in physical actions. There’s something about this shared religious concept that makes me feel connected across continents, religions, and time to the rest of our human family now and throughout history. It diminishes the diameter of the earth, and, in my opinion, that’s nearly always a good thing.

Cheers,
Amanda


What journey has changed your life? What’s the most interesting pilgrimage you’ve learned about?



Thursday, May 16, 2013

Ataturk and #FitchTheHomeless

Hi Amanda,

Okay so you've probably seen the "Fitch the Homeless" video and probably some of the various anti- "Fitch the Homeless" articles written about it.

Being the big, fat History (capital H) nerd that I am, the first thing that came to mind after watching the video was Ataturk.

Ataturk knew how to rock a stache

Ataturk was a revolutionary/president/ pseudo-dictator in Turkey for the first few decades of the 20th century. And, he was such a big deal that it is still illegal in Turkey to insult his memory. It's even part of the Facebook definition for blocked content: "Holocaust denial which focuses on hate speech [and] all attacks on Ataturk, visual and text." A little extreme but there you go.

Ataturk radically changed the culture of Turkey, and wanted desperately to Westernize it. And one of his goals was getting rid of the veil. In a predominantly Muslim country this was a delicate undertaking. Instead of pulling a France, Ataturk didn't outlaw the veil outright. Instead he made a mandate that forced prostitutes  to wear one. Since good, religious girls don't want to be confused with ho's, they stopped wearing  the veil. Bam. Ataturk'd. 

So, the Fitch the Homeless guy is trying to do something similar. He's using the negative cache of the homeless rather than of prostitutes to attack Abercrombie and Fitch. Yes, he is using homeless people to prove a point, and that's not super awesome. He obviously doesn't really care about the homeless people he's giving the clothes too. But honestly, I don't really care about the homeless people that I give money too either. I don't ask them about their days. I don't learn their names. I don't ask them what they really need. I just pull out a small bill and put it in their bucket. And then I stop thinking about them. Obviously, I'm not really acting like Jesus and neither is this guy. And I completely agree that it would be a better world if we were.  But no one can argue that this guy hasn't been effective, and I think you could also say that there are a lot more harmful things you could do for homeless people than trying to pressure a company into helping clothe more of them. 

But, there are also way more effective ways to help homeless people. It's a really kind of meh social justice campaign. It doesn't do a lot of good and it has the possibility to hurt the population its aimed at helping. 

But I'm all for making attempts at bettering the world, even ones that need improvement. The Kony 2012 campaign also had drawbacks, but hey, they're young, talented guys trying to use the privileges and opportunities awarded them to help someone else. And that's awesome. High fives for effort.

slacktavist: n. a pejorative often, but not always, used by people that aren't doing anything to help anyone. Used in reference to people that are trying to help but are perhaps doing it inefficiently or poorly. 

My major beef with the nay-sayers is that they don't give good alternatives. Anyone can point out problems,  but the most useful criticisms point out new solutions. So... here is a list of awesome charities that are consistently well ranked by third parties and could seriously benefit from both your money and your advocacy:

Against Malaria Foundation
GiveDirectly
Brother's Brother Foundation
Boys and Girls Club of America

You forgot His Girl Friday,
Steph

What are the best charities/causes?
This is your carte blanche permission to post to petitions and fundraisers and whatever. 
Let's help each other, help each other.

Like and Share!




Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Fangirl

Hey Steph,
  I am having one of those weeks where I love my job. It is one of those choices in life that has serendipitously been the perfect one for me. Unbeknownst to me at the time I chose to study editing was the fact that my career was one of the "sexiest" jobs out there. Take any given chick flick out there and the female lead is most likely a writer/reporter/editor. Here's a non-exhaustive list of movies that I don't necessarily condone or not condone in no particular order:

Never Been Kissed


Confessions of a Shopaholic


13 Going on 30

How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days



Hitch


The Proposal

Devil Wears Prada




And if it isn't the female lead, it is her male counterpart:

Runaway Bride

27 Dresses

When in Rome

Oh, and the job finds its way onto the tv as well:

Smallville

Lois and Clark

Gilmore Girls

I've tried to come up with a reason that this is such a popular job in the chick flick world. I think it is because the writer/reporter/editors are often portrayed as cute, smart, curious, and quirky, which I have to say fits the ladies I have worked with before. Unfortunately, most of these films use the job as a crutch to make their lead characters seem intelligent and complex when a lot of times they really aren't.

Nevertheless, since becoming a magazine writer and editor, I have to admit I have had an odd daydream of falling in love with someone I did a story on. I know. I hold myself up as someone who empowers women and sees the completely unrealistic portrayal of love in chick flicks. But, alas, the Disney princess-loving part of me thinks it would be such a wonderful story to share that I met my husband after writing a story on him.

I know this is utterly ridiculous, but I think there is another reason chick flicks often feature a reporter. Here's the thing. When I'm working on a story, I devote all my work time to researching on, writing about, and interviewing my subject. When I'm not doing that, I'm interviewing others about my subject. And when I'm home from work, I'm telling friends when they ask what I did that day about my subject. If I'm writing about a person, I'm basically thinking about that person most of my waking hours. And the type of reporting I do is of a primarily positive-spinning kind. We want to present the best of our subjects. So, many of us newspaper and magazine writers are the biggest fangirls and fanboys there are.

fangirl/fanboy: someone who has an irrational attachment to somebody or some group, usually a famous entity, though not always the case for writers

It's not just me. A few weeks ago, I went to a volleyball game with a coworker. She had been writing a story on one of the team for work. She kept on turning to me and making comments like, "I just want to go down there and hug him and tell him he can do it!" or "I bet he feels so nervous right now." Our reporting leaves us feeling a stronger bond than we really have with someone. One time, I was walking down a sidewalk when I saw someone I knew. I started to wave my big-hand awkward wave that I perform for all my friends, when she just passed by wondering who I was waving at. It was a few moments later when I realized that she was someone I had written a short blurb about but had never met or interviewed. Awkward.

With all these amorous feelings towards our subjects, it makes sense that magazine writers would fall for their subjects. Unfortunately, it hasn't happened for me and probably won't. But I do have one success story. I recently wrote a story on a girl who happened to be in my church group. I had met her once but didn't know much else before receiving my assignment. I got to work on her article, and, like always, I focused all my time and effort on her. Because we live near each other, I got to see her a couple times a week, so I was able to release some of my good will collected toward her while at work in actual relationship building. Now, we are pretty good friends. It might not be a boyfriend, but I'll take a good friend. It's still a good story of how we met.

Cheers,

Amanda Kae

What movies/tv shows with writer/reporter/editor leads did I leave off? What makes you into a fangirl/fanboy?

Friday, May 10, 2013

Speculative Fiction

Hello Amanda,

Yay for Friday! Okay, so I love reading Fantasy...even though the covers are seriously walking the line between 80's tacky and misogyny. But, that's not the author's fault. And it looks like the SF/Fantasy publishing world is finally updating their aesthetics. (Seriously, check out the Jim Hines cover gallery in the link, because it is hilarious).

I know SF/Fantasy isn't for everyone, but really, it's awesome. And there's really no good reason for people to get all "ha, ha, that's cute." The world can thank speculative fiction for the best illustrations of what it means to be human. I mean, Moby Dick is okay. But who didn't cry after reading  "Flowers for Algernon" or seriously question the role of bread and circuses in government after Brave New World. 1984 and Farenheit 451 are so influential that they are brought up every time legislation is proposed that would limit personal freedoms. And Samwise Gamgee will forever be the paragon of friendship for entire generations of readers.

Okay, that being said. Wow, are there some turkeys in the SF/Fantasy section of the bookstore.

I thought I'd post some of my favorite negative reviews from Amazon just to share the humor of authors taking themselves way too seriously.

Example 1. The Fifth Sorceress by Robert Newcomb
        I kid you not, the premise of this book is that if women receive extraordinary power they will inevitably become pure evil. But that's not all:

Reviewer Brian Libby writes:
This book is an exciting account of a death-struggle between two mortal foes. Only one can triumph. These deadly adversaries are the author and the English language.
English loses.  [...] "Go around it,' Shannon said quickly." "You'll soon find out,' he said sternly." "Gnomes,' he said simply." These examples are all from pp. 318 and 319, and there are two more in the same place. The first quote in the book is "Bring them up,' Wigg said simply."
HOWLERS? Oh, yes. "Swinging one leg over the pommel of his saddle, he slipped quickly to the ground." (still p. 318) I'm sure he did, if he tried to dismount by swinging his leg over his horse's head. Nice image, though.
"Don't get any ideas about stealing our horses.' He narrowed his eyes and smiled ruefully." (318 yet again!) I wonder what the author thinks 'ruefully' means?
REPETITION? Let's see...
(260) "reached out at the last possible instant"
(262) "help me wait until the last instant"
(262, 6 lines lower) "At the last possible second, Tristan..."
No editor could have been assigned to the book.

Not4prophet adds:
Some fantasy authors such as Robert Jordan have stumbled upon the problem that later volumes of their series' grow slow and repetitious. Newcomb neatly circumvents this obstacle by making his opus labored and tedious right from the start.  

These are only the highlights, there are more chuckles to be had at the expense of Mr. Newcomb here.

Example 2. Eragon by Christopher Paolini
      Imagine Star Wars in your mind. Try to think of the personalities of the main characters, and every major  plot event. Now replace lightsabers with dragons you can ride and you've got Eragon.

Starts of with mysterious, last ditch message for help from a captured princess? Check. Old, tight-lipped man on the outskirts of town turns out to be main character's new mentor and former expert at The Thing? Check. Adoptive parents and biological aunt and uncle are killed by having their house razed? Check. Still not making anything up, and that's just the exposition.

Reviewer Jonathan Appleseed writes:
 We've heard that all art is imitation (and that therefore to imitate and even copy is OK); and that imitation is the highest form of flattery. In some aspects of art, literature, and life this holds true, but not here. There is too much imitation, and not enough originality. We have (from what I'm familiar of, anyway):
* The Thirteen Forsworn (Jordan's Forsaken)
* Elves on silver ships from across the sea (Tolkien)
* Urgals and Kulls (Orcs and Uruk-Hai from Tolkien with bits of Trollocs blended in from Jordan)
* Dwarves who are absolute reproductions of those from Tolkien, from their mountain city to their use of axes, and even the description of "hewing" heads off Urgals (er, Orcs)
* A Shade (Jordan's Fade, although with an intriguing difference - and it's not the color of the hair)
* Somebody says "Hellfire!" This is an uncommon oath in the "real" world, but not an uncommon oath to Thomas Covenant. There were a couple of other Covenant similarities, but I didn't make note of them. 
There are more, but this isn't intended to be exhaustive.

And regrettably, Crossroads of Twilight by Robert Jordan.
       First let me say that Robert Jordan is a world-building genius, and you really ought to read the Wheel of Time series if you like Fantasy at all. I still finished this book over the course of four days (and it's nearly 600 pages long). But, it does lack a certain... momentum. It's also the tenth book in the series so, there's that.

Tom E. writes:
Have you ever wondered how many stripes should be on the dublet of an important dignatary from Illian? How many shawl twitches are appropriate when Aes Sedai [a sort of witch/dignitary] negotiate momentous agreements? What kind of stool the general of an Aes Sedai army sits on, and how stable said stool might be? Well buckle up for a wild ride, amigo, because you're going to learn all that (and more!) by the time you've tediously slogged to the conclusion of this book.
[...] I like nothing more than to scratch my head in befuddlement as yet another [character] is reintroduced into the plot whom I can no longer recall. It gives me an excuse to page to the back of the book and open up the 'Robert Jordan Appendix of Useless and Irrelevent Characters' which is always such a joy. I've created my own drinking game based on this,
For anyone who wants to play along the rules are simple:
1.) Is the character you're looking up totally irrelevent? Take a drink.2.) Do you have reason to suspect said character will remain totally irrelevent? Take a drink.3.) Does the character twitch her shawl? Take two drinks.4.) Is she looking "cross-eyed" at someone? Take a drink.5.) Do you know the exact design of the embroidery on the fringe of her shawl? Of course you do - take a drink. For your own sanity, consider taking another

Speculative Fiction: n. the literary equivalent of gambling. Possible outcomes include transcendent beauty, utter boredom, or wincing so severe and prolong that it becomes a permanent tick.

Have a great weekend and read a good book,
Stephanie

What are your favorite SF/Fantasy stories?
 Read any mind-blowingly bad books lately you would like to warn someone else about?












Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Reconciliation

Hey Steph!
        So I have been completely consumed by a secret project recently and have spent little time doing anything else. This is why I am posting at 11 o'clock at night. While I've reconciled myself to the idea that I won't be able to focus on much else until this project is done, the blog must go one, so I'm here to post a nice music video. :)

reconciliation: bringing together two opposing people or ideas (e.g., the part of myself that feels bad for letting go of my other responsibilities and the part of myself that is obsessed with working hour after hour on a side project)

       Before the video, let me just explain why we should all be excited about it. I'm posting a concert by the Civil Wars. Steph, you shared the Civil Wars with me a few years ago. Unbeknownst to you, this started a musical revolution in my life in which I fell in love with the Civil Wars and then with folk music and then with bluegrass. My musical heart is stuck in the wilds of the Appalachian Mountains if you ever need to find it. Thanks for sharing them with me.
      The Civil Wars are a folk duo who, in my opinion, are one of the best musicians of our era. Folk may not be everybody's thing, so I understand if some of you readers can't stand listening to any of it just because of the style. But some of the things they do musically blow my mind. Their partnership in their harmonies and slides often gives me chills. I know this is an hour long video, but I wanted to show you them live. However, any of their songs on YouTube are awesome, so feel free to just listen to "Poison and Wine" or "20 Years" or any of their songs if you just want one song.
       So a few months ago, the Civil Wars cancelled their tour and split with no word on if they would get back together. Their fans were saddened at the loss of this amazing partnership. But to the hoorays of all, they announced a new album a week ago. My heart is aflutter in folk music love. Without further ado, the Civil Wars.


Cheers,

Amanda

I'm always seeking for more music to add to my collection. What's some of your favorite groups from folk or any genre at all (Music's great in any form it comes in)

Thursday, May 2, 2013

The Other

Hey Amanda,

You're last post had me thinking a lot about people and categories. And, I feel like many times categories only serve to distance us from each other. For instance, we categorize friends as liberals or conservatives and then extrapolate from that their opinions on a constellation of topics. Perhaps, it would be better to have a conversation about how you and I feel about government aid for teen moms, regulation of environmental threats, and foreign policy in North Korea specifically rather than having a conversation where you and I represent the stances of our political affiliations to each other. A conversation where I don't assume I know what you're going to say before you say it.

Categories make for assumptions.

It's human nature to want to categorize people. And we often don't get the opportunity to know many people on a deep level, but we also don't need to insist on knowing people shallowly. I've been having a lot of conversations on gun control lately, and regrettably I got preemptively angry about a position I thought the other person would take. And that's just not the way to be a considerate human being.

I know everyone and their dog has ragged on the song "Accidental Racist" lately, so I'll keep it brief. The song is weird to me, because it represents two very large groups narrowly. It carries too many assumptions, cowboys and gangsters have many things in addition to race that complicate their relationship--rural vs. city life, economics, religion, family structure, education, pop culture. You can't categorize white and black people into categories that small.

And honestly, LL Cool J, do-rags and gold chains are frightening. They're also race neutral.  They're not necessarily the paraphernalia of gang violence, domestic abuse, and drug dealing, but they certainly don't conjure images of involved fathers, the value of education, or compassionate service. Truthfully, no one I admire wears a do-rag. And truthfully, I've also never had a conversation with someone who wears one. So I guess that's my ironic admission that some categories are really hard to overcome.

And honestly, I feel justified in that category. I feel like it wouldn't be smart not to be wary of someone dressed like a thug. (Please, tell me I'm being close-minded in the comments if you feel like that's the case. Or that do-rags aren't the same as thug culture. I grew up in suburbia, so I'll be the first to admit I don't really know what I'm talking about.)

I dunno, Amanda. I don't know how to treat people. I try to treat them like myself, which is the Elementary School answer, but that's obviously pretty terrible advice when you go around thinking everyone should think and believe as you do.

The Other:n. a remarkably difficult concept to embrace with grace and compassion, acknowledging differences in preference and custom without derision or vilification. 

Have a great weekend,
Steph

Ever have a time when your preconceptions made you act like an idiot?